1 Chronicles 5:19

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And they made war with the Hagarites, with Jetur, and Nephish, and Nodab.

Original Language Analysis

וַיַּֽעֲשׂ֥וּ And they made H6213
וַיַּֽעֲשׂ֥וּ And they made
Strong's: H6213
Word #: 1 of 7
to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest application
מִלְחָמָ֖ה war H4421
מִלְחָמָ֖ה war
Strong's: H4421
Word #: 2 of 7
a battle (i.e., the engagement); generally, war (i.e., war-fare)
עִם H5973
עִם
Strong's: H5973
Word #: 3 of 7
adverb or preposition, with (i.e., in conjunction with), in varied applications; specifically, equally with; often with prepositional prefix (and then
הַֽהַגְרִיאִ֑ים with the Hagarites H1905
הַֽהַגְרִיאִ֑ים with the Hagarites
Strong's: H1905
Word #: 4 of 7
a hagrite or member of a certain arabian clan
וִיט֥וּר with Jetur H3195
וִיט֥וּר with Jetur
Strong's: H3195
Word #: 5 of 7
jetur, a son of ishmael
וְנָפִ֖ישׁ and Nephish H5305
וְנָפִ֖ישׁ and Nephish
Strong's: H5305
Word #: 6 of 7
naphish, a son of ishmael, and his posterity
וְנוֹדָֽב׃ and Nodab H5114
וְנוֹדָֽב׃ and Nodab
Strong's: H5114
Word #: 7 of 7
nodab, an arab tribe

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Trans-Jordanian tribes and their failures section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term מַעַל (ma'al) - unfaithfulness/treachery is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting Consequences of covenant unfaithfulness.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Trans-Jordanian tribes: Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection